|
|
|
|
Approved by Faculty Senate April 14, 2003 University
Studies Course Approval Department
or Program:
Communication Studies This
is an existing course that has previously been approved by A2C2: Yes The
proposed course is designed to satisfy the requirements in: Critical Analysis Flag Course Requirements: The course aims for the following
goals: This
course includes requirements and learning activities that promote students' abilities
to... a.
Recognize and evaluate appropriate evidence to advance a claim. The student is
expected to leave this course with strong abilities to evaluate the strengths of evidence
and reasoning as they are related to claims. This
includes deductive hypothesis testing, as well as scrutiny of opened ended research
questions. In both cases, the focus of the
class is to collect and examine relevant data in regards to their thesis. The types of evidence examined in the class
include, but are not limited to qualitative evidence such as narratives and texts and
quantitative evidence such as survey data and observational/experimental
data. b.
apply critical analytical skills in advancing a theoretical position.
Throughout the course, students have repeated opportunities to advance and support
claims and positions. They participate
in individual and group activities which practice gathering evidence, evaluating evidence
and drawing conclusions from evidence which is collected, interpreted or observed. Further, students will be required to examine and
critique various approaches to making research claims, thus improving their abilities to
advance theoretical positions. c.
evaluate alternative arguments within a systematic framework. CMST
480
RESEARCH METHODS IN COMMUNICATION STUDIES Dr.
Ted Reilly | Office: 204, PAC | 457-5238 | Hours: MWF: 10-12; 1-2; M 3-4|& by appt.
Texts:
Smith,
M., J. (1988). Contemporary communication research methods. Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth. Rubin,
R. B., Rubin, A. M., & Piele, L. J. (1996). Communication research: Strategies and sources. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Description
and Goals:
This course investigates the principles and practices of research methods in
communication. We will examine varied
approaches to the study of human communication. Specifically,
we will aim for the following goals: 1. To learn the history and
significance of inquiry in the humanities, social sciences and communication.
2. To understanding theory development,
application and testing. 3. To discover the resources available to communication researchers, including databases, journals, indexes, and style sheets. 4. To learn the principles and
basic approaches social scientific inquiry in communication, including sampling, design,
and basic analysis. 5. To learn principles and
basic approaches to humanistic inquiry, including criticism, ethnography, and
interpretation. 6. To conduct preliminary research for the CMST
capstone course including research questions and literature reviews. This is a University Studies Flag course. It satisfies the requirements for the Critical Analysis flag, which require that students be able to: a. Recognize and evaluate
appropriate evidence to advance a claim b. apply critical
analytical skills in advancing a theoretical position c. evaluate alternative
arguments within a systematic framework. Course
Policies
Writing: All written work should be typed, double-spaced
and conform to an accepted style sheet. Always
include bibliography. Late
Policy: Late projects will be reduced
up to 10% for each day late. Make your 1st
priority delivering projects on time. Grade
Calculation: Standard grade scale (95=
middle A 85=B 75=C 65=D). Plus/minus are
assigned to individual projects (plus grades= 68, 78, 88; minus grades= 72, 82, 92) but
not to final grade. Grade is always
available to you. Keep track Below:
**
There will be occasional articles on reserve or distributed in class** CMST
480 Research Methods Tentative Schedule for Fall, 2001 The following three USP
requirements are noted on the schedule: a. Recognize and evaluate
appropriate evidence to advance a claim b. apply critical
analytical skills in advancing a theoretical position c. evaluate alternative
arguments within a systematic framework.
|