|
| |
Approved by Faculty Senate.
University Studies Course Proposal
Department or Program: Engineering
Course Number: ENGR 452
Course Title: Mechanical Characterization Laboratory
Number of Credits: 2
Catalog Description: (2 S.H.) A lecture-laboratory course. Experimental
characterization of composite materials, including density of fibers, fiber
content, tension, compression, flexure, in-plane shear, interlaminar shear,
fatigue and impact properties of composite materials. Effect of stress
concentration in composites. Lamina thermoelastic and off-axis response, and
nondestructive evaluations of composites. Emphasis on technical writing and
preparation of laboratory reports. This course is one of
four engineering courses that collectively satisfy 6 credits of the writing flag
requirement in the University Studies Program.
This is an existing course that has previously been approved by A2C2 Yes.
OR
This is a new course proposal No . (If this is a new course
proposal, the WSU Curriculum Approval Form must also be completed as in the
process prescribed by WSU Regulation 3-4.)
Department Contact Person for this course: Beckry Abdel-Magid
Email: beckry@winona.edu
The proposed course is designed to satisfy the requirements in (select one
area only):
Course Requirements
A. Basic Skills: B. Arts & Sciences Core:
______ 1. College Reading and Writing ______ 1. Humanities
______ 2. Oral Communication ______ 2. Natural Science
______ 3. Mathematics ______ 3. Social Science
______ 4. Physical Development and Wellness ______ 4. Fine & Performing
Arts
C. Unity and Diversity: D. Flagged Courses:
1. Critical Analysis ___X__ 1. Writing
______ 2. Science and Social Policy ______ 2. Oral
______ 3. a. Global Perspectives ______ 3. a. Mathematics/ Statistics
______ b. Multicultural Perspectives ______ b. Critical Analysis
______ 4. a. Contemporary Citizenship
______ b. Democratic Institutions
Course Syllabus
ENGR 452 - Mechanical Characterization Laboratory, Fall 2001
2 Credits Lecture: 11:00 -11:50 M Room: Stark 205
Lab: Section 1 12:00 -1:50 pm M Stark 124
Section 2 12:00 -1:50 pm W Stark 124
Instructor: Beckry Abdel-Magid, Stark 203E
Office Hours: 11:00 am - 12:00 pm WF
3:00 pm - 5:00 pm MTWF
References: 1. L.A. Carlsson and R.B. Pipes, Experimental Characterization
of Advanced Composite Materials, Prentice-Hall, 1987.
2. Agarwal and Broutman, Analysis and Performance of Fiber Composites,
2nd Edition, Wiley, 1990.
3. ASTM Standards and Literature References for Composite Materials, 2nd
Edition, 1990.
SACMA Recommended Methods, Suppliers of Advanced Composites Materials
Association.
Catalog Description:
ENGR 452 Mechanical Characterization Laboratory
- 2 S.H.
A lecture-laboratory course. Determination of density of fibers, fiber and
matrix contents, tension, compression, flexure, and shear properties of
composite materials. Determination of fatigue and impact properties, stress
concentration, lamina thermoelastic and off-axis response, and nondestructive
evaluations of composites. Emphasis on technical writing and preparation of
laboratory reports. This
course is one of four engineering courses that collectively satisfy 6 credits of
the writing flag requirement in the University Studies Program.
Prerequisites: ENG 111 College Reading and Writing,
ENGR 260 Mechanics of Materials, ENGR 360 Introduction to Composite Materials,
and STAT 303 Introduction to Engineering Statistics.
Course Objectives:
This course is designed to give junior and senior students in composite
materials engineering an ability to experimentally characterize composite and
other anisotropic materials. Students will be able to prepare specimens, perform
tests and reduce the data to determine the mechanical properties of composite
materials. An integral objective of this course is to learn to write laboratory
reports, improve technical writing skills, reduce and present data in
scientific, concise and professional manner.
This is a University Studies Program Writing Flag course. It satisfies 2
credits of the writing flag requirement. The objective of this requirement is to
promote students abilities to:
- practice the processes and procedures for creating and completing
successful writing in their fields
- understand the main features and uses of writing in their fields
- adapt their writing to the general expectations of readers in their fields
- make use of the technologies commonly used for research and writing in
their fields
- learn the conventions of evidence, format, usage, and documentation in
their fields.
Course Outline:
1. Density of High-Modulus Fibers. Determination of the density of
any continuous or discontinuous high-modulus fibers using the ASTM D 3800-79
Standard Test Method.
2. Determination of Fiber Volume Fraction. Volume fractions of the
constituents of a composite using two test methods: the matrix burn-off
method and the photomicrographic technique.
3. Strain Gage Measurements. Measurements of strains in any
structural specimen using electrical resistance strain gages.
4. Lamina Tensile Response. Determination of the tensile properties
of a single lamina using strain gages on test coupons. Young's moduli in
longitudinal and transverse directions, major and minor Poisson's ratios,
and the tensile strength of a lamina.
5. Lamina Compressive Response. Determination of the compressive
properties of a unidirectional lamina. Compressive moduli and compressive
strength of a lamina using strain gages.
6. Lamina Flexural Response. Determination of the stress-strain
response of a lamina in bending and measure the flexural modulus and the
flexural strength in the fiber direction.
7. In-plane Shear Stress-Strain Response. Determination of the
in-plane shear stress-strain properties of a unidirectional lamina. In-plane
shear modulus, in-plane shear strength, and maximum in-plane shear strain of
a unidirectional reinforced lamina.
8. Short-Beam Shear. Determination of the apparent interlaminar shear
strength of oriented fiber-resin composites using the Short-Beam Test
Method.
9. Stress Concentration. Study of various conditions of stress
concentration in composites, and how to determine the tensile properties of
oriented fiber-resin composite laminates containing a circular hole.
10. Tension-Tension Fatigue Test. Determination of the
tension-tension fatigue properties of oriented fiber composites using ASTM D
3479-76 Standard Test Method.
11. Data Acquisition. Introduction to laboratory software using
LabView. Virtual instruments, editing and debugging virtual instruments, and
an introduction to data acquisition systems..
12. Lamina Off-Axis Response. Using stress-strain response of the
off-axis specimen subjected to axial tension, the student will be able to
characterize the shear coupling phenomenon, and measure the off-axis modulus
and off-axis strength of a lamina.
13. Impact Testing. Charpy, Izod and the Drop-Weight impact tests
will be introduced. The drop-weight impact test will be used to measure the
load-time curve.
14. Non-Destructive Evaluation of Composite Materials. An overview of
damage identification in composites using ultrasonic techniques, acoustic
emission techniques, imbedded fiber optics, and x-ray direction.
Course Requirements and Means of Evaluation:
Requirements: Attendance in all lectures; Performance of experiments; and
Submission of fourteen laboratory reports
Evaluation: Laboratory experiments, group work, and
communication of data 15%
Laboratory Reports 65%
Final Exam 20%
Total 100%
A grade of: 90 or above is A, 80 or above is B, 70 or above is C, 60 or above
is D
Contribution of Course to Writing Flag Requirements:
|
Topic |
Outcome |
|
Course 3/4. Composites Characterization Techniques |
Creating & completing successful writing |
Understand features of uses of writing in engineering |
Adapt writing to expectations in engineering |
Use of technology in research and writing |
Conventions of evidence, format, usage, & documentation in
engineering |
|
Density of high-modulus fibers |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Determination of fiber volume fraction |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Lamina tensile response |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Lamina compressive response |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Lamina flexural response |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
In-plane shear stress-strain response |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Short-beam shear |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Stress concentration |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Tension-tension fatigue test |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Lamina thermoelastic response |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Lamina off-axis response |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Impact testing and non-destructive evaluation of composite materials |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
- Requirements and learning activities that promote students abilities to
practice the processes and procedures for creating and completing successful
writing in their fields.
In each topic and each week of the semester students conduct an experiment
and write a complete report describing the test procedure, the analysis of
results, and the conclusions of the experiment. The format of the reports is
similar to technical and professional reports in engineering practice and
scientific journals in the engineering field.
- Requirements and learning activities that promote students abilities to
understand the main features and uses of writing in their fields.
Students are required to follow the technical report-writing standards in
the field of engineering. Each report includes a cover letter, title page,
table of contents, introduction, procedure, results, discussion and
conclusions. These sections constitute the main features of writing in the
engineering and scientific fields.
- Requirements and learning activities that promote students abilities to
adapt their writing to the general expectations of readers in their fields.
In preparing their reports, the students organize the contents and write
the texts considering the standpoint of the reader. The reader is interested
in the nature of the problem, the method used to attack the problem, the
results obtained, and the experimenter's analysis of the results. In addition,
the findings of the investigation should be clearly illustrated and defended.
Usually, results are backed by similar findings in the published literature or
a scientific justification is provided to explain the anomalies.
- Requirements and learning activities that promote students abilities to
make use of the technologies commonly used for research and writing in their
fields.
For each topic, the students are required to read the American Society of
Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards and specifications, perform research on
the materials to be tested, conduct the tests, and compare their results with
published values in the literature. In this exercise, students use library
search, engineering index data search and various Web searches. Students use
state-of-the-art data acquisition systems, such as INSTRON, MTS TESTWORKS and
LABVIEW, and up-to-date software to perform their analyses and write their
reports. Students are also required to consult with the writing lab in Minne
340 to discuss their writing styles and edit their reports.
- Requirements and learning activities that promote students abilities to
learn the conventions of evidence, format, usage, and documentation in their
fields.
In each topic, students are required to discuss their findings, and address
the specific questions forwarded in the assignment. If the answers do not
adequately cover the important aspects of the results, these are covered in
addition. The discussion is based on both the results of laboratory work and
similar work reported in the literature. Attempts should be made to explain
observed anomalies. Particularly worthwhile points of discussion are: accuracy
and practical significance of laboratory results. A good amount of literature
research is desirable in most cases. In the conclusions section, students are
required to provide a summary of the major findings and the significant
implications of their test results.
The guidelines of the preparations of the laboratory reports are attached.
Department of Engineering
ENGR 452 - Mechanical Characterization Laboratory
PREPARATION OF LABORATORY REPORTS
ORGANIZATION AND CONTENT
In preparing a report, the organization should be considered from the
standpoint of the reader. He/she is interested in the nature of the problem, the
method used to attack the problem, the results obtained, and the experimenter's
analysis of the results. Therefore, the report should have the following form:
Cover Letter. Response to company requesting the test services.
May include a brief summary of major findings.
Title Page. This page should indicate the project, author's name,
date, and course.
Table of Contents. Include titles, subtitles, appendices and page
numbers.
Introduction. The nature of the project should be described
briefly. Normally a few sentences will be sufficient, unless some unusual
features are involved. The composite used in the test should be described in
detail under this heading; this description should be based primarily on
three major items: fiber classification, matrix composition, and composite
type (such as prepreg, short fiber, etc.). Additional pertinent adjectives
can be used, where applicable, to describe items such as: generic name,
orientation, or structure.
Procedure. Standard procedures already described in textbooks or
class notes need not be rewritten in the report, but they may be simply
referenced. However, specific test conditions should be noted, and special
aspects involved in the procedure, and not covered elsewhere, should be
described.
Results. Only the final summary of results, usually either in
tabular or graphical form, should be shown in this portion of the report. All
other preliminary results should appear in an appendix. No results or
computations of any type should be omitted from the appendix, except for the
summary of results appearing in the report proper.
Discussion. There may be specific questions concerning the
project, and these should be answered carefully. If the answers do not
adequately cover the important aspects of the results, these should be
covered in addition. Such discussion should be based on both the results of
laboratory work and similar work reported in the literature. Attempts should
be made to explain observed anomalies. Particularly worthwhile points of
discussion are accuracy and practical significance of laboratory results. A
limited amount of literature research is desirable in most cases.
Conclusions. A brief summary of the major findings and the
significant implications of the test results (one paragraph, or two at the
most).
References. A reference list indicating all sources of information
used for the report should be given. The format of the references list
should be consistent in itself and according to some standard style,
one acceptable example of which is included with these instructions. Number
the references and refer to each reference by the corresponding number or by
the name of the author.
Appendix (or Appendices). This portion of the report should
contain all laboratory sheets, calculations, secondary results, instruction
sheets, and relevant data not of sufficient importance to appear in the
report proper.
GENERAL FORM
Neatness. Neatness is a habit developed by conscious effort.
Consequently, there is no excuse for an untidy report. Typing is required.
Coordination with the Writing Lab is strictly recommended. Greater attention
should be given to neatness in the more important parts of the report (e.g.,
Title Page, Results, etc.). The laboratory sheets, on which original
readings and computations are recorded, may be submitted in their original
form as an appendix to the report. An effort should be made to be neat when
completing these sheets in the laboratory. It is also essential that each
sheet be complete with regard to sample number, date, etc.
Graphs. Graphs are frequently the most important part of the
report, since they often summarize the results of the work. Therefore, a
carefully considered presentation is vital. Important points to be followed
in drawing graphs include the following:
1. Provide a prominent and descriptive title.
2. Clearly indicate coordinate scales and appropriate units.
3. Where a curve is based on a formulation, show a line only; do not
show points through which the line is drawn.
4. Show points corresponding to experimental data clearly and
distinctly; then, use a smooth prominent curve to indicate the trend
suggested by these points.
5. The scale projections or grid lines crossing the graph should be
thin lines which are insignificant in comparison to the curve indicating
the results.
6. All curves should be drawn with a french curve, if necessary.
7. Curves and points representing different portions of the work
should preferably be differentiated by use of different symbols or color
print.
8. At least one inch of clear margin is desirable on all sides of the
graph.
9. Pages which are read from the side should be placed with the
bottom at the right-hand, or unbound, side.
Tables. When the results are reported in tabular form, titles and
linework should be given care similar to that used for graphs. Thicker lines
should separate major groupings, with thinner lines used elsewhere.
FURTHER INFORMATION
Further information on report writing may be found in many appropriate texts,
(1,2,3).
REFERENCES
1. Lesikar, R.V., (1984). How To Write a Report Your Boss Will Read
and Remember, Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, Illinois.
2. Michaelson, H., (1989). How To Write and Publish Engineering
Papers and Reports, Oryx Press, Phoenix, Arizona.
3. Mali, P., and Sykes, R., (1985). Writing and Wordprocessing for
Engineers and Scientists, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York.
Approval/Disapproval Recommendations
Department Recommendation: Approved_____ Disapproved____ Date:______
Chairperson Signature_______________________ Date______
Dean's Recommendation: Approved_____ Disapproved ____* Date:______
Dean's Signature_______________________ Date______
*In the case of a Dean's recommendation to disapprove a proposal a written
rationale for the recommendation to disapprove shall be provided to USS
USS Recommendation: Approved_____ Disapproved____ Date:______
University Studies Director's Signature_______________________ Date______
A2C2 Recommendation: Approved_____ Disapproved_____ Date:______
A2C2 Chairperson Signature_______________________ Date______
Faculty Senate Recommendation: Approved_____ Disapproved____ Date:______
FA President's Signature_______________________ Date______
Academic Vice President's Recommendation: Approved_____ Disapproved____
Date:______
VP's Signature_______________________ Date______
President's Decision: Approved_____ Disapproved____ Date:______
President's Signature_______________________ Date______
|