|
| |
Approved by Faculty Senate.
University Studies Course Approval
| Department or Program |
English |
| Course Number |
111 |
| Semester Hours |
4 |
| Frequency of Offering |
every semester (approx. 25 sections of 25 students) |
| Course Title |
College Reading and Writing |
| Catalog Description |
Writing based on reading, interpreting, analyzing, critiquing
and synthesizing texts; writing as a means of expression, learning and critical inquiry.
Offered every semester. |
| This is an existing course previously approved by A2C2: |
Yes |
| This is a new course proposal: |
No |
| (If this is a new course proposal, the WSU Curriculum
Approval Form must also be completed as in the process prescribed by WSU Regulation 3-4) |
|
| Proposal Category: |
Basic Skills/College Reading and Writing |
| Departmental Contact: |
J Paul Johnson, Associate Professor |
| Email Address: |
pjohnson@winona.edu |
| Department Approval and Date: |
|
| Deans Recommendation and Date: |
|
English 111
College Reading and Writing 4 s.h.
A General Education/University Studies Basic Skills Course
Proposal and Rationale
Catalog Description
Writing based on reading, interpreting, analyzing, critiquing, and synthesizing texts;
writing as a means of expression, learning and critical inquiry. Offered every semester.
General Course Information
English 111 is the required Basic Skills College Reading and Writing course in the WSU
University Studies Program. The program is designed to provide a broad base of skills and
knowledge to equip students for informed, responsible citizenship in a changing world.
This four-credit course fulfills the College Reading and Writing requirement in the
University Studies Program. All WSU students are additionally expected to complete at
least two "Writing Flag" courses in their major or minor program, and individual
departments and programs may have additional further requirements. The purpose of English
111 is to help WSU students increase their critical reading, thinking, and writing skills.
The course will help students develop a mature writing style and an ability to integrate
material from multiple sources with their own writing. The course will further emphasize
writing as essential to academic learning and intellectual development. This class is
designed to establish a foundation for the reading and writing done in later college
courses, supporting a larger writing-across-the-curriculum educational experience.
Rationale
USP Course Objectives:
- Students will read challenging texts that reflect important cultural themes and
demand critical thinking.
Unlike some composition courses, English 111 provides a rigorous reading experience,
one intended not only to help students read critically but also to inform their writing.
Most of the reading is non-fiction prose: some readings serve an illustrative purpose, as
models of a specific prose genre; others provide a range of perspectives on classical
and/or contemporary issues. On a regular basis, students will read selections from an
anthology of thematically or rhetorically selected essays, or, alternatively, a series of
selected books. Although selections will vary from section to section, course readings are
typically chosen for their thematic relevance, rhetorical mode, and intellectual
challenge.
- Students will analyze the rhetoric and structure of (their own and
others) arguments.
Good writers need to understand the structure of argument, and they need
practice in identifying and using rhetorical strategies for argumentation and development.
Both in class and in their writing, students will study the rhetorical structure of
argument, evaluate arguments for their effectiveness, and critique their own arguments.
- Students will summarize and critique examples of mature expository and argumentative
prose.
The ability to write an accurate summary of a prose piece is integral to writing
in college, as is the ability to articulate a judicious critique, whether that critique is
based on the accuracy of evidence, the structure of the argument, or the rhetorical
approach. Students will write formal summaries of selected readings in different genres.
Students will also write formal and/or informal critiques of those readings.
- Students will revise through multiple drafts and critical readings to create and
complete successful essays.
Contemporary scholarship suggests that students can produce their best work when
provided the occasion for revision based on critical reading. In a writing course,
students need to write frequently, and their writing needs to be read. Aside from their
informal writing, students typically compose between four and eight papers through
multiple drafts, consisting of 20-30 pages (5000-7500 words) of polished prose. Students
can expect prompt feedback on their work: most instructors report a turnaround time of one
week for formal papers and require personal conferences with students. Students can also
expect regular informal writing activities and exercises.
- Students will formulate intelligent claims and make purposeful, appropriately documented
use of authoritative sources as supporting evidence.
Successful academic writing is dependent upon the ability to evaluate and use
appropriate evidence in support of well-constructed claims. And every discipline expects
appropriately documented use of sources in students research writing. Students
formal writing will require the use of intelligent claims supported by evidence documented
in one or more commonly recognized documentation formats, such as MLA, APA, or Chicago
style. However, since English 111 provides only an introduction to, and practice in,
documented writing, the course does not provide in-depth training in the use of any single
documentation style.
- Students will make use of basic tools of research, such as general indexes,
periodicals, and on-line databases.
Successful academic writing is dependent upon an ability to find, locate,
evaluate, and use information relevant to the subject matter. Students will use WebPALS
(including the online catalog, ERIC, EAI, etc.) and other current databases (such as
LexisNexis, FirstSearch, J-Stor, Project MUSE, and Encyclopedia Britannica) for
their research writing. Individual course sections typically include an introduction to,
and practice in, using the WSU Library for research.
- Students will construct coherent essays based on reading, interpreting, analyzing,
critiquing, and synthesizing texts.
Successful writing depends upon being able to formulate an argument that is
coherentthat is to say, one in which evidence is used to support claims or reasons
that support a thesis, and one in which appropriate organizational cues are used to signal
the essays structure to the reader. Additionally, since much academic writing is
based on the close reading of texts, most writing projects assigned in the class will be
based on students reading, and classroom activities will include advice and guidance
in methods of critical reading, from interpretation and analysis to critique and
synthesis.
- Students will adapt the structure, content, and tone of their writing to the knowledge
and attitudes of their audience.
Successful writing is contextual: good writers strive to accommodate the needs
of their readers when structuring their arguments, when adapting their tone, and when
evaluating their content. Critical reading assignments will include the study of different
authors approaches to adapting structure, content, and tone to an audience. In the
process of writing in different genres and for different audiences, students will practice
these strategies for adapting their writing to varying rhetorical situations.
- Students will use vivid, concrete language; concise, varied sentences; unified, cohesive
paragraphs; gender-inclusive English; and a college-level vocabulary.
Although successful writing is context-bound (in that "what works" in
one context might not in another), certain features of successful writing are nonetheless
germane to nearly every rhetorical situation: concrete language, varied sentencing,
cohesive paragraphs, correct English, and appropriate vocabulary. Through a series of
formal writing assignments, in-class exercises, and handbook review, students will be
taught and encouraged to use these features of formal prose style.
- Students will proofread, edit, and correct their final copy for common errors of
spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and usage.
While research suggests that college-level writing is no more error-free (nor
more error-ridden) than that of previous generations, the kinds of errors made most
frequently do change from one generation to the next. Successful writing, however, needs
to be carefully proofread, edited, and corrected in order for it to have any kind of
persuasive function in most formal situations. Through in-class and other exercises and
activities, students will study common errors typical to college-level student prose; they
will further practice proofreading and editing strategies for finding and correcting these
errors. Formal papers will be held to a high standard of correctness.
Note
English 111 can not by itself prepare students for the rigors of upper-division
writing-intensive courses in specific programs and departments, but is intended as a
general introduction to college-level writing. The Department of English encourages all
departments and programs to build on this preparation by helping students learn
 | the processes and procedures for creating and completing successful writing in their
fields; |
 | the main features and uses of writing in their fields; |
 | the general expectations of readers in their fields; |
 | the technologies commonly used for research and writing in their fields; and |
 | the conventions of evidence, format, usage, and documentation in their fields. |
English 111
College Reading and Writing 4 s.h.
A General Education/University Studies Basic Skills Course
Sample Course Syllabus (will vary from instructor to instructor)
Catalog Description
Writing based on reading, interpreting, analyzing, critiquing, and synthesizing texts;
writing as a means of expression, learning and critical inquiry. Offered every semester.
General Course Information
English 111 is the required Basic Skills College Reading and Writing course in the WSU
University Studies Program. The program is designed to provide a broad base of skills and
knowledge to equip students for informed, responsible citizenship in a changing world.
This four-credit course fulfills the College Reading and Writing requirement in the
University Studies Program.
The purpose of English 111 is to help WSU students increase their critical reading,
thinking, and writing skills. The course will help students develop a mature writing style
and an ability to integrate material from multiple sources with their own writing. The
course will further emphasize writing as essential to academic learning and intellectual
development. This class is designed to establish a foundation for the reading and writing
done in later college courses, supporting a larger writing-across-the-curriculum
educational experience.
As the required Basic Skills College Reading and Writing course in
the WSU University Studies Program, English 111 includes requirements and learning
activities that promote students abilities to
- read challenging texts that reflect important cultural themes and demand critical
thinking;
- analyze the rhetoric and structure of (their own and others) arguments;
- summarize and critique examples of mature expository and argumentative prose;
- revise through multiple drafts and critical readings to create and complete successful
essays;
- formulate intelligent claims and make purposeful, appropriate documented use of
authoritative sources as supporting evidence;
- make use of basic tools of research, such as general indexes, periodicals, and on-line
databases;
- construct coherent essays based on reading, interpreting, analyzing, critiquing, and
synthesizing texts;
- adapt the structure, content, and tone of their writing to the knowledge and attitudes
of their audience;
- use vivid, concrete language; concise, varied sentences; unified, cohesive paragraphs;
gender-inclusive English; and a college-level vocabulary; and
- proofread, edit, and correct their final copy for common errors of spelling,
punctuation, capitalization, and usage.
As class requirements and activities are discussed and listed below, they will refer to
objectives in the above list by letter.
Texts and Supplies
 | rhetoric: Axelrod & Cooper, The St. Martin's Guide to Writing, 5e (paperback) |
 | handbook: Lunsford & Connors, EasyWriter |
 | readings: Wolff, This Boy's Life; Santiago, When I Was Puerto Rican; Toth,
The Mole People; Bissinger, Friday Night Lights; Medved, Hollywood Vs.
America; Isaacs, Brave Dames & Wimpettes; Lefkovitz, Our Guys; Blumberg,
The Body Project. |
Journals
The journal will be a collection of responses to readings and other short assignments,
including many exercises in SMG, some of which students will complete in class.
Writing in the journal need not be "polished" to earn credit, but it must be
thoughtful. Its purpose is to help students achieve critical thinking as readers,
flexibility as researchers, and fluency as writers (cf. outcomes a, b, c, h, i).
The Portfolio
The portfolio will include selected pieces of "finished" writing as well as
some "work-in-process" and self-assessment. By the time a finished piece of
writing appears in the final portfolio, it will have been painstakingly planned, drafted,
workshopped, and revised (j). Submitted essays must provide essays evidence of the
writing process (invention/field notes, interview transcripts, early drafts, written
feedback, etc.), since all submitted written work must be produced in class, prompted by
class discussion and critiqued by colleagues and instructor alike (d).
Major Writing Projects
| project |
description |
length |
draft |
models |
| a personal narrative (SMG
ch.2) |
narrate an autobiographical
event, showing the details of its occurrence and speculating about its significance; the
goal is to present a compelling story in precise detail and vivid language (d, h, i) |
1000 words |
week 3, with a revision at
midterm (d) |
This Boys Life, When I
Was Puerto Rican (a) |
| a case study of an
intriguing person, place, or activity (SMG ch.4) |
drawing primarily (but not
exclusively) on field research, profile a subject in an attempt to enlighten and inform
your audience (d, h, i) |
1500 words, two sources |
week 6, with a revision at
midterm (d) |
The Mole People, Friday Night
Lights (a) |
| a position paper (SMG ch.6) |
articulate and defend a thesis in
response to Medved or Isaacs; the goal is to make the thesis understandable and rational
to an intelligent, informed audience by using clear claims and persuasive evidence (d,
e) |
1500 words, five sources |
week 11, with a revision at final
conference (d) |
Hollywood Vs. America, Brave
Dames & Wimpettes (a) |
| a researched analysis (SMG
ch.9) |
research and present a careful
analysis of a phenomenon suggested by reading Lefkowitz or Brumberg; the goal is to
persuade the audience of a subject's existence and importance, then to speculate
intelligently about its causes, implications, or effects (e, f, g) |
2500 words, ten sources |
week 14, with a revision in the
final portfolio (d) |
The Body Project, Our Guys (a) |
Conferences & Draft Workshops
Individual conferences and scheduled draft workshops will provide opportunities to
receive structured, constructive feedback before work is evaluated in the portfolio.
Classmates will read the work carefully and critically, responding to specific strategies,
details, claims, and evidence. And either in conference or on revisions, instructor
feedback will be aimed at helping each student rethink and revise the project for
inclusion in the final portfolio (d).
Book Forums
The purpose of the book forums is the continued exchange of academic ideas beyond and
outside our Minné classroom. To earn credit for book forum participation, students can
(1) address the posted questions and/or raise new questions for further discussion; (2)
make connections between different course texts; and (3) tactfully and purposefully
respond to anothers question (a, b).
Panel Presentations
During the semester, students will participate in formal class presentations called
"panels," where they will present and discuss a published book. These should be
business-like models of efficiency and articulateness. Students should use appropriate
informational handouts and visual aids to enhance their audiences understanding. The
purpose will be to inform other students in the class of the books contents, to
engage them in its description, and to familiarize them with an example of a particular
genre of writing (a, b, e).
Evaluation and
Grading
Class participation will be evaluated by the following:
 | Journals: timely, purposeful, engaged completion of 100% of assigned journal entries |
 | Drafts: complete, timely, purposeful, engaged submission of assigned drafts |
 | Conferences and Workshops: active, tolerant, communicative, well-prepared participation |
 | Book Forums: timely, demonstrated, convincing, purposeful participation in at least five
book forums |
 | Presentations and Participation: well-prepared, articulate, purposeful participation in
panel presentations; consistently meaningful contributions to others presentations |
The writing portfolio will be evaluated by the following:
 | a developed ability to read for comprehension, evaluation, & interpretation (a,
b, c) |
 | an ability to engage and persuade critical audiences in different rhetorical situations (h) |
 | convincing evidence of an ability to research thoroughly, to think critically and
articulately (e) |
 | sound arguments, unmarred by fallacies, implementing alternative points of view (b,
e) |
 | clearly-presented organizations, with consistently helpful cues: forecasts, transitions,
summaries, etc. (g) |
 | concise, intelligent, qualified claims, supported with specific evidence from
authoritative sources (e, f, g) |
 | correct documentation in MLA and APA formats (e) |
 | consistently accurate, purposeful quotation and paraphrase (e) |
 | efficient, varied sentences and rhetorically effective, accurate language (I) |
 | correct, rhetorically effective use of punctuation, usage, & mechanics conventions (i,
j) |
 | a developed ability to improve writing through diligent, purposeful revision (d) |
Sample Project Calendar
8/26 SMG ch. 12, reading critically: the structure of argument (b)
8/31 SMG ch. 1, "the" writing process: myth, ritual, and practice (d,
j)
9/2 SMG ch. 2, readings in narrative: Wolff, Dillard, Auster (a);
summaries due (c)
9/7 reading & panel presentation: Wolff, This Boy's Life (a,
b, c)
9/9 reading & panel presentation: Santiago, When I Was Puerto Rican (a,
b, c)
9/14 post draft of event essay for workshop critique; critical reading
(b)
9/16 reading: Tan, G. Wolff; SMG ch. 13 & 14 on narration, description;
complete, read workshop critiques (b, d)
9/21 submit revised event paper (d, i)
9/23 SMG ch. 4, readings: New Yorker, Manegold, Noonan (a);
summaries due (c); strategies for field research
9/28 SMG ch. 20, observing and describing
9/30 interview notes, transcript, follow-up; integrating researched information (e,
f)
10/5 reading & panel presentation: Toth, The Mole People (a,
b, c)
10/7 reading & panel presentation: Bissinger, Friday Night Lights (a,
b, c)
10/12 post draft of profile essay for workshop critique; critical reading (b)
10/14 meet in Library 102. complete and read workshop critiques (b, d); proofreading
& editing (i, j)
Note: submit midterm portfolio by 3 pm Monday, October 18
10/19 SMG ch. 6 readings Estrada, Ehrenreich, Molyneux (a); the
rhetoric of argument (b, c, e)
10/21 evaluating claims and evidence (b, c, e)
10/26 types of claims and evidence; logical fallacies (e)
10/28 reading & panel presentation: Medved, Hollywood Vs. America (a,
b, c)
11/2 reading & panel presentation: Isaacs, Brave Dames &
Wimpettes (a, b, c)
11/4 Meet in Library 102. SMG ch. 21 & 22, library and internet research
(f)
11/9 Meet in Library 102. post draft of position paper for workshop
critique; SMG ch. 13, cues for coherence (g, i)
11/11 complete and read workshop critiques (b); adapting tone &
content (h)
11/16 submit revised position paper (d, h)
11/18 SMG ch. 9, readings: King, Berger, Putnam (a); summaries due (c)
11/23 panel presentation: Lefkowitz, Our Guys (a, b, c)
11/25 panel presentation: Brumberg, The Body Project (a, b, c)
11/30 Meet in Library 102. Documenting electronic and other media (e, f, g)
12/2 annotated bibliography Due: 12 sources for analysis paper (f)
12/7 post draft of analysis paper for workshop critique; critical reading (b)
12/9 complete and read workshop critiques (b); proofreading & editing (i,
j)
12/13 final exam period 10:30 a.m-12:30 p.m.: final portfolios due; final exam
essay; course assessment
This schedule is tentative and subject to revision;
specifics of daily assignments and deadlines will be discussed in class.
Sample Writing Project: Researched Analysis
Research and present a careful analysis of a phenomenon suggested by your reading of
Lefkowitz or Brumberg; the goal is to persuade your audience of your subject's existence
and importance, then to speculate intelligently about its causes, implications, or
effects.
In 1989 a group of popular high school athletes lured a retarded girl into a
suburban basement in Glen Ridge, New Jersey, and gang-raped her. But weeks passed before
the rape was reported to the police, and many of the towns elders defended the boys
while blaming the victim. Why did these jocks "our guys" do what
they did? And why did the town defend them while vilifying the girl? Bernard
Lefkowitzs prizewinning book Our Guys details the events of the crime and
provides some intelligent, difficult answers.
A century ago, most American young women shared an ideal: to develop a pure heart
through the accomplishment of good deeds. Today, American women have more social choices
and personal freedom than ever before; however, many of them are dissatisfied with their
bodies, unconcerned with good deeds in the historical sense, and on their way by
age eight or nine to a long-term obsession with weight, diet, beauty, and body. Why
is this so? In The Body Project, historian Joan Jacobs Brumberg explores personal
diaries and media images to arrive at answers.
Works like Our Guys and The Body Project, then, are analyses
speculative explorations of the causes of cultural phenomena. Although they are in
many ways persuasive, they do not aim primarily to argue. Instead, they (1) demonstrate
authoritatively that their subject exists and is worth consideration; and (2) provide
thoughtful analysis of causes. This kind of analysis rarely yields irrefutable
"proof"; causal analysis is largely speculative. Nonetheless, Lefkowitz and
Brumberg investigate their subjects with zeal and intelligence, demonstrating a number of
plausible reasons why "our guys" did what they did and why "the body
project" has become so all-consuming. Both authors works are the products of
inquiring, intellectual minds eager to learn why what happened, happened.
This project requires you to write a careful researched analysis of any phenomenon
suggested by your reading of Lefkowitz or Brumberg. Your essay will analyze causes, rather
than argue a position or advocate for solutions. Lefkowitzs book might inspire you
to study gang rape, victims rights, plea bargaining, homoeroticism, sex crimes by
athletes, or rape trauma syndrome; Brumbergs, dieting, piercing, mentoring,
"coming out," body "perfecting," "bad body fever," or
"ovarian determinism." You will need to present some coherent, purposeful
summary of the relevant sections of Our Guys or The Body Project; to
articulate and defend a focused, analytical thesis; to use researched evidence to support
clear, conspicuous claims demonstrating both the subjects existence (and
scope) and your analysis of its causes; and to make use of at least eight authoritative
sources of correctly presented and documented research (MLA or APA format), with accurate
paraphrase and quotation.
After our close reading of Lefkowitz and Brumberg in the panel presentations,
youll post the draft to our workshop, where youll receive thorough critical
readings from two classmates. At that stage, your revision concerns should include
providing helpful cues for readers and correct, conventional usage. Ill also be
reading your work in conference during the semesters last week of classes. For the
final portfolio, the paper must be at least ten double-spaced pages (2500 words) with a
Works Cited or References list.
DATES
 | 11/30 Library Research Day; Meet in Library 102 (f) |
 | 12/2 Annotated Bibliography and Prospectus Due (e, f) |
 | 12/7 Post Draft to Workshop for Critique (d) |
 | 12/9 Complete and Read Workshop Critiques (b, d, h) |
GOALS
 | coherent, purposeful summary (a, c) |
 | a focused, analytical thesis (e) |
 | authoritative researched evidence (e) |
 | clear, conspicuous claims (e) |
 | correctly presented and documented research (f) |
 | accurate paraphrase and quotation (e |
 | helpful cues for readers (g, h) |
 | correct, conventional usage (I, j) |
Visit the WRITING CENTER in Minné 340 for free help with this and other
assignments
|