|
| |
Approved by Faculty Senate.
University Studies Course Approval
| Department or Program |
English |
| Course Number |
211 |
| Semester Hours |
3 |
| Frequency of Offering |
every year |
| Course Title |
Writing in Communities |
| Catalog Description |
The study and practice of
writing as a means of participation in a diverse, democratic, and literate society.
Development of students ability to understand and use writing as a means of ethical
decision-making, community activism, and civic collaboration. Offered yearly.
Prerequisite: English 111. |
| This is an existing
course previously approved by A2C2: |
No |
| This is a new course
proposal: |
Yes |
| (If this is a new course
proposal, the WSU Curriculum Approval Form must also be completed as in the process
prescribed by WSU Regulation 3-4) |
see attached |
| Proposal Category: |
Unity &
Diversity/Contemporary Citizenship |
| Departmental Contact: |
J Paul Johnson, Associate
Professor |
| Email Address: |
pjohnson@winona.edu |
English 211
Writing in Communities 3 s.h.
A University Studies Contemporary Citizenship Course
Proposal and Rationale
Catalog Description
The study and practice of writing as a means of participation in a diverse, democratic,
and literate society. Development of students ability to understand and use writing
as a means of ethical decision-making, community activism, and civic collaboration.
Offered yearly. Prerequisite: English 111.
General Course Information
English 211 is an elective course in the WSU University Studies Program. The program is
designed to provide a broad base of skills and knowledge to equip students for informed,
responsible citizenship in a changing world. The purpose of the Contemporary Citizenship
requirement is to provide students with the ability to participate as effective citizens
in a democratic, multicultural, and global society. Courses in this area will focus on
developing the skills and knowledge base to enhance students ability to make
effective decisions, pursue personal well-being, work collaboratively with others, and/or
participate effectively in professional or civic responsibilities.
This course includes requirements and learning activities that promote students'
abilities to...
- use critical thinking to analyze contemporary issues;
- demonstrate effective oral and/or written communication of ideas, informed opinions,
and/or values;
- identify, find, and use tools of information science related to contemporary issues;
- demonstrate the ability to work effectively independently and/or in collaborative
problem-solving groups; and
- participate actively (e.g., class discussion, volunteerism, etc.) in issues significant
to citizenship
in contemporary society.
Rationale
- Students will use critical thinking to analyze contemporary issues.
Although this class borrows liberally from classical (as well as 20th-century)
rhetoric in its approach to the study and practice of argumentation, the topics of
analysis in English 211 are themselves contemporarythe rhetoric of public debate,
the actions of local citizens, the dialogue of engaged citizenship, and the persuasive
effects of advertising media. On a daily basis, students can be expected to make use of
critical thinking approaches (evaluation, synthesis, causal analysis) to study, both in
class and in writing projects, the rhetoric of contemporary issues. Through a carefully
designed sequence of writing projects, students will develop their critical thinking
activities as they analyze contemporary issues. Introductory assignments require careful
description and narration of contemporary issues and dilemmas in the intellectual,
political, and local community. Other assignments require students to evaluate the ethos,
logos, and pathos of public documents for their rhetorical effects; to propose a plan of
action in response to a local concern; to research and report on a local community
concern; and to argue, in a public forum, an informed position on a contemporary issue.
Supporting classroom activities will engage students, on a daily basis, in a variety of
activities, both written and oral, to support the development of critical thinking
abilities: for example, draft workshops will engage students in the careful rhetorical
critique of colleagues work, and journal exercises will provide opportunities for
students to practice different means and methods of argumentation.
- Students will demonstrate effective written communication of ideas, informed opinions,
and values.
Central to the missions of the USP and the Department of English alike is the
effectiveness of written communication, and this course provides multiple occasions for
students to develop their abilities as they encounter complex rhetorical situations
demanding carefully composed responses, and as they subject their work-in-progress to the
critique of their instructor, colleagues, and other readers. As a writing course, English
211 demands effective written communication, with a series of writing projects designed to
involve students in ethical, participatory, community activism. Both in class and in their
writing, students will study the rhetorical structure of argument, evaluate arguments for
their effectiveness, and critique their own arguments. Students will adapt the structure,
content, and tone of their writing to the knowledge and attitudes of their audience. In
the process of writing in different genres and for different audiences, students will
practice these strategies for adapting their writing to varying rhetorical situations.
Regardless of the situation, however, students will be expected to use vivid, concrete
language; concise, varied sentences; unified, cohesive paragraphs; gender-inclusive
English; and a college-level vocabulary. Students will further be expected to proofread,
edit, and correct their final copy for common errors of spelling, punctuation,
capitalization, and usageespecially in certain contexts that place an absolute
premium on grammatical correctness.
- Students will identify, find, and use tools of information science related to
contemporary issues.
Successful citizenship demands a thorough knowledge base, and much of the work
of this course will demand rigorous library and field research. The ability to find,
locate, evaluate, and use information relevant to the subject matter is crucial to the
community service writing project in particular. Students will use WebPALS (including the
online catalog, ERIC, EAI, etc.) and other current databases (such as LexisNexis,
FirstSearch, J-Stor, Project MUSE, and Encyclopedia Britannica) for their research
writing. To an equal extent, students will practice strategies for field
researchinterviews, direct observations, surveys, document reviewand
incorporate their material into writing for variety audiences. Some of the work for the
course will demand accurate, purposeful use of MLA documentation format, though given the
variety of rhetorical situations students encounter in the course, other systems and
strategies for documenting source material will necessarily be used as well.
- Students will demonstrate the ability to work effectively independently and/or in
collaborative problem-solving groups.
Successful citizenship demands the ability to work both independently and
collaboratively, and English 211 provides multiple occasions for guided work in both. Most
writing for the course is done independentlythough not in a vacuumas students
keep individual journals, compose individual papers, and reflect critically on their own
written use of the language. However, as befits the social, participatory nature of the
citizenship requirement, a major emphasis of the course is collaborative in nature. The
major course project in "Writing for Communities" is a collaborative
community-service project that includes (1) an extensive, collaboratively-researched and
-authored report; (2) a collaboratively-produced public document with a clear message for
a specific audience; and (3) an individually-composed public commentary on the subject,
written for a specific publication. Although some of the work is completed individually,
the success of the project (described in greater detail in the course syllabus) is
dependent upon the ability to work effectively in a collaborative problem-solving group,
one that must in turn collaborate effectively with others.
- Students will participate actively (e.g., class discussion, volunteerism, etc.) in
issues significant to citizenship in contemporary society.
On a daily basis, students will engage in discussion of ethical, political, and
sociolinguistic issues that are relevant to contemporary citizenship, and they will
explore these issues both in class discussion and in informal writing activities. Although
the scope of issues is indeed broad, the binding cement is the study of the written use of
language in the public sphere. English 211 not only "discusses" contemporary
citizenship, however: it practices contemporary citizenship, with students
composing letters, opinion pieces, research reports, and public documents, all for
consideration in the public sphere, where real readers are motivated by real concerns. The
collaborative community service-project described both above and in the attached syllabus
provides a significant, concentrated, extensive opportunity for active participation. As
but one example, a group might (1) use field and library research to investigate the use
and/or abuse of mind-altering drugs at youth "raves," composing a 15-page
research report for all local community youth groups; (2) produce a series of
"public-awareness" flyers for distribution in the schools; and (3) have
individual group members compose public commentaries for publication in the local media.
English 211
Writing in Communities 3 s.h.
A University Studies Unity & Diversity / Contemporary Citizenship Course
Sample Course Syllabus (will vary from instructor to instructor°
)
The study and practice of writing as a means of participation in a diverse, democratic,
and literate society. Development of students ability to understand and use writing
as a means of ethical decision-making, community activism, and civic collaboration.
Offered yearly. Prerequisite: English 111.
General Course Information
English 211 is an elective course in the WSU University Studies Program. The program is
designed to provide a broad base of skills and knowledge to equip students for informed,
responsible citizenship in a changing world. The purpose of the Contemporary Citizenship
requirement is to provide students with the ability to participate as effective citizens
in a democratic, multicultural, and global society. Writing in Communities will focus on
developing the skills and knowledge base to enhance students ability to make
effective decisions, work collaboratively with others, and/or participate effectively in
professional or civic responsibilities.
This course includes requirements and learning activities that promote students'
abilities to...
- use critical thinking to analyze contemporary issues;
- demonstrate effective oral and/or written communication of ideas, informed opinions,
and/or values;
- identify, find, and use tools of information science related to contemporary issues;
- demonstrate the ability to work effectively independently and/or in collaborative
problem-solving groups; and
- participate actively (e.g., class discussion, volunteerism, etc.) in issues significant
to citizenship
in contemporary society.
As class requirements and activities are discussed and listed below, they will refer to
objectives in the above list by letter. In addition, this course addresses the following
English Department goals, including requirements and learning activities that promote
students abilities to...
 | read critical texts, expository prose, and [other] types of writing that have frequently
not been used in the curriculum of the major, including the writing of their fellow
students. (Goal 4) |
 | write in several modes and for different audiences and purposes, with an awareness of
the social and critical implications these shifts raise. (Goal 5) |
 | understand how their education translates into lives and careers outside the classroom,
[particularly]
in social and ethical issues important to citizens of a changing
world and democratic society. (Goal 6) |
Texts and Supplies
 | rhetoric: Flower, Problem-Solving Strategies for Writing in College and
Community |
 | readers: Ervin, Public Literacy; Escholz and Rosa, Language Awareness |
 | handbook: Lunsford & Connors, EasyWriter (or equivalent) |
Journals
The journal will be a collection of responses to readings and other short assignments,
including many exercises, some of which students will complete in class. Writing in the
journal need not be "polished" to earn credit, but it must be thoughtful. Its
purpose is to help students achieve critical thinking as readers, flexibility as
researchers, and fluency as writers (cf. outcomes a, b, c, d).
Major Writing Projects (may vary, but always include
community service project)
| |
project |
description |
length |
due |
points |
| |
a case study |
drawing primarily on field
research, narrate a case study of an ethical dilemma in writing for a public audience (a,
b) |
1000 words |
week 3 |
10 |
| |
an evaluation of a
public document |
using techniques of
rhetorical analysis, evaluate a written public document for its ethical consideration and
persuasive effect (a, b, c) |
1000 words |
week 5 |
10 |
| |
an action letter |
address a letter to a
public figure, agency, or forum articulating a plan for community action (a, b, c) |
200-400 words |
week 7 |
10 |
| |
a collaboratively-authored
research report |
with your colleagues (and
in collaboration with a local agency), identify, research, and report on a community
problem; the report should describe the problem in detail and with effective language, and
it should offer one or more proposed plans for action (a, b, c, d, e) |
5000 words |
week 10 |
25 |
| |
a collaboratively-authored
public document |
with your colleagues,
plan, design, and publish a document for public audiences, one which can be kept and
revised by one or more local agencies (b, d, e) |
negotiable |
week 12 |
25 |
| |
a public commentary |
based on your research for
the community project, compose a public commentary piece for a local, regional, or
national media outlet (a, b, d, e) |
500 words |
week 14 |
20 |
Conferences & Draft Workshops
Individual conferences and scheduled workshops will provide opportunities to receive
structured, constructive feedback before work is evaluated. Classmates will read the work
carefully and critically, responding to specific strategies, details, claims, and
evidence. And either in conference or on revisions, instructor feedback will be aimed at
helping each student rethink and revise for rhetorical effect (a, d).
Community Service Project
The major course project in "Writing in Communities" is a collaborative
community-service project that includes (1) a collaboratively-researched and -authored
report; (2) a collaboratively-produced public document with a clear message for a specific
audience; and (3) an individually-composed public commentary on the subject, written for a
specific publication. As one example, a group might (1) use field and library research to
investigate the use and/or abuse of mind-altering drugs at youth "raves,"
composing a 15-page research report for all local community youth groups; (2) produce a
series of "public-awareness" flyers for distribution in the schools; and (3)
have individual group members compose public commentaries for publication in the local
media (a, b, c, d, e).
Evaluation and
Grading
Class participation will be evaluated by the following:
 | Journals: timely, purposeful, engaged completion of 100% of assigned journal entries (a,
b, c, d) |
 | Papers: complete, timely, purposeful, engaged submission of assigned drafts (a, b) |
 | Conferences and Workshops: active, tolerant, communicative, well-prepared participation (d) |
 | Presentations and Participation: well-prepared, articulate, purposeful participation in
class (e) |
Student writing projects will be evaluated by the following:
 | a developed ability to read use critical thinking strategies for comprehension,
evaluation, & interpretation (a) |
 | an ability to engage and persuade critical audiences in different rhetorical situations (b) |
 | convincing evidence of an ability to research thoroughly, to think critically and
articulately (c) |
 | sound arguments, unmarred by fallacies, implementing alternative points of view (a,
b) |
 | clearly-presented organizations, with consistently helpful cues: forecasts, transitions,
summaries, etc. (b) |
 | concise, intelligent, qualified claims, supported with specific evidence from
authoritative sources (a, b, c) |
 | correct documentation in appropriate formats (c) |
 | consistently accurate, purposeful quotation and paraphrase from library and field
research sources (c, d) |
 | efficient, varied sentences and rhetorically effective, accurate language (b) |
 | correct, rhetorically effective use of punctuation, usage, & mechanics conventions (b) |
 | a developed ability to achieve use writing as a means of participating in community
service (e) |
|