|
| |
Approved by Faculty Senate
University Studies Course Approval
Department: Psychology
Course Number: 325
Semester Hours: 3
Frequency Offered: Every semester
Course Title: Social Psychology
Catalog Description: Overview of theories and research in social psychology. Topics
include: person perception, the self, stereotyping and prejudice,
attitudes and persuasion, interpersonal relationships, and group
behavior. Prerequisite: Psychology 210.
A2C2 Approved Course? Yes
Requested Approval: Arts and Sciences Core: Social Science
Contact Person: Peter Miene, pmiene@winona.edu
Description of Requirements and Learning Activities that promote students' abilities to
1. understand humans as individuals and as parts of larger social systems
Social psychology is typically defined as the scientific study of the effects of social
and cognitive
processes on the way individuals perceive, influence, and relate to others (Smith &
Mackie
2000). As such, this course is fundamentally concerned with theory and research devoted to
understanding human behavior both as individuals and as parts of larger social systems
(e.g.,
chapters on interpersonal relationships, altruism and aggression, conformity to social
norms). In
addition, the course content examines how all individuals attempt to understand themselves
individually (e.g., chapters on the self and on attitudes) and as parts of social systems
(e.g.,
chapters on social cognition, person perception, stereotyping and prejudice). Social
Psychology is
thus concerned both with a scientific description of how humans behave as "social
animals" as
well as with understanding how humans attempt to understand their social world. Learning
activities designed to promote this understanding include: assigned readings from the
textbook
and a few primary sources; lectures/videotapes and discussion; in-class demonstrations;
small
group discussion and activities; in-class writing assignments.
2. understand the historical context of the social sciences
Social psychology is concerned with social and cognitive processes. Although cognitive
processes may be relatively invariate across historical contexts, social processes are
inextricably
linked to their larger social context. As a discipline, social psychology was strongly
influenced by
the Gestalt psychologists forced to flee Germany in the 1930s as the Nazis came to power.
World
War II provided an important testing ground for research on attitudes and persuasion and
intergroup relations. A discussion of stereotypes and prejudice necessarily includes the
historical
context provided by attempts to desegregate our society (e.g., Brown v. Board of
Education,
1954, the Civil Rights movement). Understanding why Americans became fascinated
with/troubled
by the possibility of subliminal persuasion in the 1950s is presented in the context of
the fear of
communism and the Cold War. Many other examples of social psychological phenomena are
presented in historical context. Learning activities designed to promote this
understanding include:
assigned readings from the textbook; readings from a few primary sources;
lectures/videotapes and
discussion; in-class demonstrations; small group discussion and activities; in-class
writing assignments;
internet assignments and other computer applications.
3. identify problems and frame research questions relating to humans and their
experience
Social psychology is, almost by definition, interested in issues and processes that all
humans are
concerned with (understanding the self and the social world), and much of the content may
therefore seem a matter of "common sense." One pivotal concept in the social
psychology course,
therefore, is understanding why the experimental method, and not personal experience,
provides
the data necessary for drawing cause and effect conclusions. In addition, we discuss a
great deal
of research that may be at odds with what appears to be "common sense" (e.g.,
research in social
cognition suggests we frequently make decisions that are at odds with how we think we make
decisions). At the beginning of the course I differentiate between basic and applied
research, and
then make the point that much of social psychological research is necessarily both. That
is, even
the most theoretically-driven laboratory experiment frequently informs and can be applied
to the
"real world" because the theoretical questions are concerned with how people
influence and relate
to one another. Learning activities designed to promote this understanding include:
assigned readings
from the textbook; readings from a few primary sources; lectures/videotapes and
discussion; in-class
demonstrations; small group discussion and activities; in-class writing assignments;
internet assignments
and other computer applications.
4. become familiar with the process of theory-building and theoretical frameworks used
by
the social sciences
The best research in social psychology tends to start with a "real world"
observation, develops a theoretical
explanation for the occurance, and then systematically tests the observation and the
conditions under which it
holds true. For example, in the 1950s, Leon Festinger made a number of observations that
appeared at odds
with traditional reward/punishment models of behavior (e.g., a severe initiation into a
group causes increased
liking for that group). From these observations came the foundation for cognitive
dissonance theory, a theory
which makes interesting and sometimes counterintuitve predictions about behavior, that
continues to be refined
and revised nearly 50 years later. The first unit describes the process of translating
theoretical constructs into
observable, measurable independent and dependent variables. A framework for understanding
and evaluating
the construct validity, internal validity, and external validity of a study is presented
in the first unit and is then
systematically employed throughout the course. Major social psychological theories (in
addition to cognitive
dissonance) and their supporting research are presented througout the course (e.g.,
attribution theory, self-
perception theory, social identity theory). Learning activities designed to promote this
understanding include:
assigned readings from the textbook; readings from a few primary sources;
lectures/videotapes and discussion;
in-class demonstrations; small group discussion and activities; in-class writing
assignments; internet assignments
and other computer applications.
5. understand the research methods used in the social sciences
Social psychology is an experimental discipline, and the course primarily examines
experimental methods (as
opposed to correlational or observational methods) designed to understand social and
cognitive processes.
Two particular problems in social psychological research include the social desirability
response bias (the
desire on the part of the research participant to provide the "good" or
"normal" or "appropriate" response),
and demand characteristics (features of the experimental situation and/or of the
experimenter that suggest
how a participant ought to respond), and we discuss numerous strategies employed by social
psychologists
to combat these problems. As described in point 4 above, the framework for evaluating
research introduced
in the first unit is applied throughout the rest of the course. Learning activities
designed to promote this
understanding include: assigned readings from the textbook; readings from a few primary
sources;
lectures/videotapes and discussion; in-class demonstrations; small group discussion and
activities; in-class
writing assignments; internet assignments and other computer applications.
6. describe and detail discipline-specific knowledge and its applications
Although I frequently make some revisions to the material covered, certain core topics
are always a part of the
course. Core topics include: person perception (factors influencing the impressions we
form of others, the
attributions we make for their behavior, and the interesting effects caused by the object
of perception having
the capability of perceiving you right back); the self (how we perceive and think about
ourself); stereotypes/prejudice/discrimination (how we think about, feel about, and behave
toward members of social
groups to which we do not belong); attitudes (how they are formed, changed, and
potentially direct our behavior
as individuals); social norms (how they influence our behavior as individuals as well as
members of a larger group);
interpersonal attraction and close relationships (who and why we like and love the people
we do); groups in conflict
(reasons for and interventions to reduce conflict); and social dilemmas (behaviors that
bring benefit to the self but
bring harm to the social group to which the person belongs, thus ultimately harming the
self). Through the discussion
of all these topics, applications to the law, business and industry, and education are
frequently made. For example,
research on conformity can be applied to jury decision-making. Research on the theory of
stereotype threat makes
specific (and amazingly simple yet effective) recommendations for improving educational
success for minorities in
the classroom. Research on attitudes and persuasion is easily applied to marketing
campaigns and advertising strategies. Learning activities designed to promote this
understanding include: assigned readings from the textbook; readings from
a few primary sources; lectures/videotapes and discussion; in-class demonstrations; small
group discussion and activities; in-class writing assignments; internet assignments and
other computer applications.
7. understand differences among and commonalities across humans and their experience
As a discipline, psychology is inherently interested in both individual differences and
commonalities across the human experience. One of the major themes of social psychology is
understanding individual behavior as a response to the
social situation; although individual differences certainly emerge, the research
frequently points to the power of the
situation to influence behavior. One prime example would be the work of Stanley Milgram on
obedience. Milgram
was disturbed by Nazi war criminals explaining their behavior as simply a product of
following orders, and he began
a program of research designed to show that Germans were especially likely to demonstrate
obedience. He developed
the infamous teacher/learner paradigm with the intent of demonstrating Americans would
defy instructions to harm another person, but through the course of this program of
research, he ended up demonstrating the "shocking" tendency of all
humans to obey, regardless of age, gender, educational level, race, and culture. Many
other social psychological
phenomena first observed in North America are now being replicated across cultures.
Differences across human experience are also to be observed in social psychology. For
example, large gender differences frequently emerge in the ways men and women think about
and behave in interpersonal relationships. Cultural differences emerge in terms of how we
explain a person's behavior: North American adults are especially likely to explain
behavior in terms of characteristics of the person, while children and adults from more
collectivist cultures tend to explain behavior in terms of situational influences.
Although most psychologists discount race as an important biological construct, it clearly
remains as a defining social construct. Research on differential treatment on the basis of
skin color, for example, demonstrates that even small differences in treatment can lead to
important social effects. Personality differences also typically influence human behavior
in social situations. Learning activities designed to promote this understanding include:
assigned readings from the textbook; readings from a few primary sources;
lectures/videotapes and discussion; in-class demonstrations; small group discussion and
activities; in-class writing assignments; internet assignments and other computer
applications.
Psychology 325
Social Psychology
Example Syllabus
Instructor: Dr. Peter Miene
Office: Phelps 231 I
Phone: 457-5668
email: pmiene@winona.edu
Office Hours: MTWRF
and by appointment
Required
Textbook: Smith, E. & Mackie, D. (2000). Social
Psychology (2nd Ed.).
Psychology Press.
UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM OUTCOMES:
Psy 325 has been approved by the University Studies Program as a Social Science course
within the Arts and Sciences Core. As a University Studies course, Social Psychology is
designed to promote students' abilities to:
1). understand humans as individuals and parts of larger social systems
2). understand the historical context of the social sciences
3). identify problems and frame research questions relating to humans and their experience
4). become familiar with the process of theory building and theoretical frameworks used by
the social sciences
5). understand the research methods used in the social sciences
6). describe discipline specific knowledge and its applications
7). understand differences among and commonalities across humans and their experience,
as tied to such variables as gender, race, socioeconomic status,
etc.
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course is designed to provide students with an introduction to the discipline of
social psychology
with a special emphasis on experimental social psychology. We will cover some of the major
topical
areas and theories of concern to social psychologists, such as person perception,
stereotyping & prejudice,
attitudes & persuasion, and norms & group behavior. The course will emphasize the
underlying themes and
principles which unite these areas of study.
COURSE STRUCTURE:
Format. Class sessions will be a mixture of lecture, videos, and discussion.
Students are expected to keep
up with the readings for each unit and should come to class prepared to ask or answer
questions and
discuss the material. The majority of the topics covered in this course have "real
world" applications to
social issues/problems, and quality discussion necessitates that students have done the
readings prior to class.
The content in lecture will overlap what is presented in the book to some extent, but
lectures are definitely
not just a repeat of what you have already read.
Exams. Exams will be a mixture of multiple choice and essay questions, and they
will cover material
presented in class only, in the text only, as well as material covered in both. There are
5 exams in this
course, contributing 500 points to the course grade (100 points each). Each exam
will cover only
material presented/discussed during that unit; the final exam is the last unit exam and is
not comprehensive.
Projects. There will be a number of in-class writing projects that YOU MUST BE IN
CLASS TO
COMPLETE. There may also be a few writing assignments to be completed outside of class.
These assignments will contribute a total of 50 points to the course grade.
Optional Paper. Students have the option of writing a 4 - 5 page critical analysis
paper to replace their
lowest exam score (assuming the paper grade is higher than the exam score it is
replacing). The paper
must follow a specific format, and I will be providing instructions regarding the paper
following the first
exam. Papers may be submitted any time during the semester, but absolutely no later
than....
Grades. Grades will be assigned according to a percentage of the total number of
points possible in the
course (550 points possible).
A = 90% and up (495 to 550 points) C = 70% to 79% (385 to 439 points)
B = 80% to 89% (440 to 494 points) D = 60% to 69% (330 to 384 points)
Course Schedule
University Studies Program
Day/Date Topic
Reading
Social Science Outcomes addressed
M 8/28 Course Overview
1,2,6
W 8/30 Introduction
Chp. 1
brief history of social psychology
F 9/1 Research
Chp. 2
3,4,5,6
W 9/6 Research
Chp. 2
discussion of theory building, theoretical
frameworks, and research methods using
specific research examples
F 9/8 Research quiz
A&M*
M 9/11 Perceiving Individuals
Chp.
3
2,5,6,7
W 9/13 Perceiving Individuals
Chp.
3
factors influencing person perception,
F 9/15 Perceiving Individuals
Chp. 3
detection of deception, behavioral
M 9/18 EXAM 1
confirmation and research issues
W 9/20 Perceiving Groups
Chp. 5
1,2,3,4,5,6,7
F 9/22 Perceiving Groups
Chp. 5
in-depth discussion of stereotyping, prejudice,
M 9/25 Perceiving Groups
Chp. 5
and discrimination: considers historical
W 9/27 Social Identity
Chp. 6
context, theory building, research issues &
F 9/29 Social Identity
Chp. 6
problems, the human tendency to categorize
M 10/2 Social Identity
Chp. 6
into groups, social influences and
W 10/4 Social Identity
Steele**
individual differences
F 10/6 EXAM 2
W 10/11 The Self
Chp. 4
3,5,6,7
F 10/13 The Self
Chp. 4
theories and research examining the self
M 10/16 Attitudes & Change
Chp. 7
1,2,4,5,6
W 10/18 Attitudes & Change
Chp. 7
study of attitude formation, change, and
F 10/20 Attitudes & Behavior
Chp.
8
influence on behavior; historical context,
M 10/23 Attitudes & Behavior
Chp. 8
theoretical frameworks; research methods
W 10/25 Attitudes & Behavior
Chp. 8
and problems
F 10/27 EXAM 3
Day/Date Topic
Reading
Social Science Objectives met
M 10/30 Groups, Norms,
Chp. 9
1,2,3,4,5,6,7
W 11/1 and Conformity
Chp. 9
the influence of social norms on behavior of
F 11/3 Norms & Behavior
Chp. 10
individuals as members of groups, and on
M 11/6 Norms & Behavior
Chp. 10
groupsthemselves; historical context, theory
W 11/8 Norms & Behavior
Chp. 10
&
research on conformity & obedience;
M 11/13 Interaction in Groups
Chp. 12
commonalities across gender, race,
W 11/15 EXAM 4
culture, educational level
F 11/17 Liking & Loving
Chp. 11
3,5,6,7
M 11/20 Liking & Loving
Chp. 11
discussion of theory and research in
M 11/27 Liking & Loving
Chp. 11
interpersonal attraction and relationships
W 11/29 Conflict
Chp. 13
3,5,6,7
F 12/1 Conflict
Chp. 13
theory and research in group conflict
M 12/4 Helping
Chp. 14
1,6 individual differences and social
influences related to decisions to help
W 12/6 Social Dilemmas
Chp. 14
1,6 discussion of individuals acting within
F 12/8 Social Dilemmas
Chp. 14
a larger social system, seeking self interest
can bring harm to the group (and thus self)
T 12/12 FINAL EXAM
8:00 - 10:00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Aronson, E. & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for
a group. Journal
of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 177-181.
**Marx, D., Brown, J. & Steele, C. (1999). Allport's legacy and the situational
press of stereotypes.
Journal of Social Issues, 55, 491-501.
|